Modern Engineering for Design of Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines. David H. Download the Full PDF this how-to text bridges the gap between basic physical and design principles and actual rocket-engine design as it's done in industry. [PDF BOOK] Modern Engineering for Design of Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines By Dieter K. Huzel Download EBOOK EPUB KINDLE. This book intends to build a bridge for the student and the young engineer: to link the rocket Performance Parameters of a Liquid PropellantRocket Engine . . 10 chanical parts, a modern rocket engine employs a number of.
|Language:||English, Spanish, French|
|Genre:||Politics & Laws|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
PDF Download Modern Engineering for Design of Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines (Progress in Astronautics & Aeronautics) PDF File. Modern Engineering for Design of Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines. Front Cover Most engineering companies and universities use SI units for rocketry. The present publication introduces the fundamental principles of liquid-propellant rocket engines that are required for actual design applications. After an.
The large bell- or cone-shaped nozzle extension beyond the throat gives the rocket engine its characteristic shape. The exit static pressure of the exhaust jet depends on the chamber pressure and the ratio of exit to throat area of the nozzle. As exit pressure varies from the ambient atmospheric pressure, a choked nozzle is said to be under-expanded exit pressure greater than ambient , perfectly expanded exit pressure equals ambient , over-expanded exit pressure less than ambient; shock diamonds form outside the nozzle , or grossly over-expanded a shock wave forms inside the nozzle extension.
In practice, perfect expansion is only achievable with a variable-exit area nozzle since ambient pressure decreases as altitude increases , and is not possible above a certain altitude as ambient pressure approaches zero.
If the nozzle is not perfectly expanded, then loss of efficiency occurs. Grossly over-expanded nozzles lose less efficiency, but can cause mechanical problems with the nozzle. Fixed-area nozzles become progressively more under-expanded as they gain altitude. Almost all de Laval nozzles will be momentarily grossly over-expanded during startup in an atmosphere. Back pressure and optimal expansion[ edit ] For optimal performance, the pressure of the gas at the end of the nozzle should just equal the ambient pressure: if the exhaust's pressure is lower than the ambient pressure, then the vehicle will be slowed by the difference in pressure between the top of the engine and the exit; on the other hand, if the exhaust's pressure is higher, then exhaust pressure that could have been converted into thrust is not converted, and energy is wasted.
To maintain this ideal of equality between the exhaust's exit pressure and the ambient pressure, the diameter of the nozzle would need to increase with altitude, giving the pressure a longer nozzle to act on and reducing the exit pressure and temperature. This increase is difficult to arrange in a lightweight fashion, although is routinely done with other forms of jet engines.
In rocketry a lightweight compromise nozzle is generally used and some reduction in atmospheric performance occurs when used at other than the 'design altitude' or when throttled. To improve on this, various exotic nozzle designs such as the plug nozzle , stepped nozzles , the expanding nozzle and the aerospike have been proposed, each providing some way to adapt to changing ambient air pressure and each allowing the gas to expand further against the nozzle, giving extra thrust at higher altitudes.
When exhausting into a sufficiently low ambient pressure vacuum several issues arise. One is the sheer weight of the nozzle—beyond a certain point, for a particular vehicle, the extra weight of the nozzle outweighs any performance gained. Secondly, as the exhaust gases adiabatically expand within the nozzle they cool, and eventually some of the chemicals can freeze, producing 'snow' within the jet.
A small arc of the blades of the two turbines were immersed in the exhaust gas of the main nozzle over F , and he experienced frequent turbine failures. Therefore,Goddard developeda GG that had a lower gas temperature. The TPs were small low ow and inef cient. In he used a fuel-rich GG without water.
The early TPs for JATO and aircraft superperformance had a turbineand both the propellantpumps on the same single shaft.
The rst large U. TP Redstone engine designed had two in-line shafts, a coupling, and an aluminum turbine because this was a proven German technology on the V-2 engine. Historically the large U. TPs of the s and s used a gear case that allowed a turbine to rotate at a higher speed than one or both of the propellantpumps because this allowed better turbine and pump ef ciencies.
This resulted in a lower GG ow and a slightly better engine performance than a single-shaft TP. Initially oil was supplied from a small oil pump to lubricate and cool the gears and the bearings, but the oil was then replaced by kerosene fuel.
The steel alloy turbine was usually driven by a GG, which used the same propellants as the main TC but usually at a fuel rich mixture ratio , resulting in a gas between and F. A gear case was also used on the Pratt and Whitney family of RL engines to allow the oxidizer pump to rotate slower than the fuel pump. An inducer impeller ahead of and on the same shaft as the main pump impellerwas used duringWorld War II in the TP of the German Walter aircraft rocket engine.
It provided for better cavitation resistance of the main pump impellers, and it allowed the tank pressure to be lowered, resulting in a weight reduction of the propellant tank. It can also allow the main pump to run at a higher speed, which in turn allows a reduction of inert TP weight.
The United States was late in adopting this clever innovation. Several of the U. LPRE TP that were already in productionwere changed in the s to use redesigned pumps, which included inducer impellers.
This happened to the Thor and Atlas engines. An inducer can be seen in Fig. Goddards concept of separate TP assemblies for the fuel and the oxidizer pump was revived several decades later for propellantcombinations where the fuel and the oxidizer have very different densities.
Major design advanced were made in TPs in recent years. Small Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines These small engines with multiple thrust chambers often called thrusters have a very important role for the vehicles ight control. Although a large LPRE is usually assembled and delivered in a single package, a small LPRE, with multiple TCs placed in several different locations in a vehicle , is normally delivered in several pieces. Thrust levels are typically between 1 and lbf, but there were some that were larger lbf or more.
They generally use storable propellants and a pressurized gas feed system. There were several differentways to obtain a small thrust, and they are explained brie y in their approximate historical sequence. More details are in Sec. The rst solution for attitude control was the orderly expulsion of an inert cold gas, such as air or nitrogen, which was stored at high pressure and exhausted through simple valves, regulators, and multiple nozzles.
Cold gas for attitude control was used starting in the late s and continuing sporadically until about These systems were simple, low cost, reliable, and ran at ambient temperatures. However the speci c impulse was low around 70 s and the systems were heavy, adding to the inert mass of the vehicle.
They were used on many early satellites and for roll control on some upper stages.
Several companies have built and own cold-gas thrusters. In the period, small monopropellanthydrogen peroxide thrusters became popular. The relatively low gas temperatures F depending on the peroxide concentration allowed the use of simple single-walllow-carbon-steelconstructionand avoided the need for a cooling jacket. It was usually decomposed by a silver screen catalyst and used a pressurizedgas feed system.
Thrust levels were between 0. They were used extensively, for example, on the Mercury manned space capsule, and more than thrusterswere own. Next came hydrazine monopropellant thrusters to present with pebble-type catalysts, again a pressurized feed system, and uncooled alloy steel TC walls.
Hydrazinethrusterswere made possibleby the development of a suitable catalyst and by making ultrapure hydrazine, which did not poison the catalyst. The example in Fig.
The advantage of these monopropellants are the inherentsimplicity of the system good reliability ,high propellantdensities small propellanttanks ,and clean exhauststhat will not fog up sensitive surfaces window, mirrors, solar cells.
Its principaldemerits are the lower performance compared to bipropellants, resulting in a heavier system, and hydrazines high freezing point 34 F , requiring heating of all components. Multithruster hydrazine monopropellant systems have been used on hundreds of spacecraft or upper ight vehicle stages and are still popular today. The low-thrust bipropellantthrusters also started in the late s and are still used today on many upper stages, spacecraft, and satellites.
Bipropellants give higher speci c impulses s than hydrazine monopropellant s. Initial propellants were nitric acid and later NTO as oxidizer and hydrazine as a fuel. These fuels had a lower freezing point, but slightly lower performance. However, these fuels can, under certain conditions, cause thin undesirable deposits of solid particles in the combustion products on sensitive vehicle surfaces windows, solar cells. With the high gas temperatures, some form of cooling of the TC walls is needed.
Regenerativecooling can no longer be used because the heat capacity of the low fuel cooling ow would not be adequate to absorb all of the heat rejected by the hot gas to the inner walls. The cooling fuel would boil, causing a drastic change in mixture ratio. The thrusters often use some lm cooling, but by ityself, this is not suf cient.
One good solution came with a small experimental radiation-cooledthrusters, which were developed in and by MarquardtCorporation,one of the predecessorsof Aerojets Redmond Center. Molybdenum was soon replaced by niobium also called columbium , which is lighter and easier to fabricate.
It has a niobium disilicide inner coating for oxidation protection. A later design Marquardts lbf thruster shown in Fig. Ablative liners were also an early solution for small thrusterswith many starts. The ablative liner is made of glass, Kevlar , or carbon bers woven in a ber cloth in a plasticmatrix, and the cloth is laid in layers before heating and compressing the material and surrounding it by a metal shell.
Sometimes a ceramic sleeve or a graphite nozzle insert is used to minimize erosion. Figure 12 shows a lbf thruster left and a lbf thruster used on the Gemini manned capsule, its maneuvering system module, or the Apollo command module. They were gradually replaced by radiation-cooledmetal thrustersbecauseablativeswere relatively heavy and had dirty exhausts,which have caused unwanted deposits on mirrors or solar cells.
The third type of bipropellant thruster called Interregen was developed by Rocketdyne in the late s. It uses a relatively thick wall of beryllium a low-density, high-conductivity metal for the chamber nozzle material. The beryllium conducts the heat away from the hot-throat region to a lm-cooled region in the chamber.
It has own in postboost control propulsion systems. Therefore,all LPREs must be designedand proven to be free of such instabilities. Three types of vibrations have been identi ed. The rst is a low-frequencychugging cps or interactionof the liquid propellant feed system with the oscillating gas in the combustion chamber.
This includesoscillationsof propellantsin long feed pipes, often called POGO instability. Remedies included modi cations in the feed system, increasing the injection pressure drop, and for POGO instability the addition of damping accumulators in the pipe lines. Frequencies depend on the size and structural resonances.
Changes in the chamber geometry, injector con guration, and in the structural stiffness of the affected components became effective countermeasures. By about , the understanding of the rst two vibration types was good enough to diagnose incidents and take effective remedial actions. The last type of combustion vibration occurs at high frequency above cps. It has since been linked to the burning process itself and to pressure waves and chamber acoustic resonances.
When it did occur, it would cause high-frequency large-amplitude chamber pressure oscillations, cause sudden increases in heat transfer or the forces exerted by the TC, and lead to a structural or heat transfer failure of the TC in less than a second of time.
Often this instability would occur only in one test run out of perhaps or ring tests. Therefore, the only method for assuring a stable design in these early days was to run hundreds of static tests on the same identicalenginedesignwithout a singleincidentof combustion instability.
A rating technique was developed between and No notes for slide. Book Details Author: Dieter K. Huzel ,David H.
Huang Pages: Hardcover Brand: Description From the component design, to the subsystem design, to the engine systems design, engine development and flight-vehicle application, this how-to text bridges the gap between basic physical and design principles and actual rocket-engine design as it's done in industry.
If you want to download this book, click link in the next page 5.
Thank You For Visiting. You just clipped your first slide! Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips. Visibility Others can see my Clipboard.